Feature × Audience

How does government run on-prem AI with Plugsky?

Government teams deploy on-prem Plugsky when classification or connectivity rules rule out shared infrastructure: inference runs inside the perimeter or air-gapped network, the same OpenAI-compatible API serves accredited applications, keys stay in agency custody with RBAC and SSO, and audit events stream to the agency SIEM. Model bundles and update paths are confirmed during accreditation.

Key facts

Government fitAccredited applications call one API inside the agency perimeter
DeploymentSame OpenAI-compatible API in your VPC, on-prem or air-gapped
Data pathPrompts, embeddings and logs never leave the agency network
Models30+ models; air-gapped bundles confirmed under the licensing agreement
Live endpointsChat, streaming, function calling, JSON mode and embeddings
IdentityAgency-held scoped keys, SSO with SCIM and RBAC for operators
AuditAuthentication, key lifecycle and admin events exportable to SIEM
PricingFlat monthly self-serve plans; enterprise deployment scoped on the pricing page

TL;DR

  • Match deployment to classification: on-prem for controlled data, air-gapped for disconnected sites.
  • Keep keys in agency custody and rotate them under documented dual control.
  • Reuse the OpenAI-compatible API so accredited applications stay unchanged.
  • Give assessors one evidence path: auth, key and admin events in the agency SIEM.
  • Agree model bundle and update procedures before the accreditation review, not after.

How it works, step by step

  1. Record the classification and handling rules for each candidate workload; these decide whether VPC, on-prem or air-gapped deployment is permissible.
  2. Design the network zone and egress rules so only accredited subnets can reach the model endpoint, and only approved destinations are reachable from it.
  3. Put key custody in the agency's secret management with documented rotation, dual control and an auditable issue and revoke process.
  4. Integrate SSO with SCIM for operator access and RBAC for policy changes, and keep human and service identities separate.
  5. Export authentication, key lifecycle, admin and inference events to the agency SIEM, and align prompt retention with records policy.
  6. Run a threat model and a limited pilot on unclassified data with a named owner and defined exit criteria.
  7. Prepare the accreditation pack: topology, data flows, controls, evidence sources, update and incident procedures.
1Record theclassification andhandling rules for2Design the networkzone and egressrules so only3Put key custody inthe agency's secretmanagement with4Integrate SSO withSCIM for operatoraccess and RBAC for5Exportauthentication, keylifecycle, admin6Run a threat modeland a limited piloton unclassified

Try it yourself

Open the sovereign AI readiness score →

When on-prem or air-gapped is the only option

Shared cloud is acceptable for many government workloads, but classification, sovereignty or network isolation rules the door for others. On-prem deployment keeps inference and logs inside the agency network while applications continue to call one OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Air-gapped deployment goes further: the platform runs in a disconnected enclave, with model bundles supplied under the licensing agreement and updates carried in through the agency's own process.

Because the API surface is identical across variants, an application accredited against a pilot deployment does not need rework when it moves to a more isolated environment — the topology changes, the integration does not.

What assessors will ask

Accreditation reviews focus on control ownership and evidence. Be ready with a concrete story for each area.

  • Key custody: agency-held secrets, documented rotation, dual control, prompt revocation on role change.
  • Identity: SSO with SCIM for staff, scoped keys for services, RBAC for administrative actions.
  • Data flow: which subnets reach the endpoint, where logs and embeddings live, what retention applies.
  • Evidence: authentication, key and admin events in the SIEM, joined with model metadata.
  • Change: how platform and model bundle updates are approved, applied and rolled back.

Operations, cost and honest trade-offs

Self-hosting is not free: the agency owns capacity, patching, monitoring and incident response, and the procurement case should include those costs alongside licensing. Compare against VPC deployment and the flat monthly plans on the live pricing page before assuming on-prem is cheaper — it is chosen for control, not economy.

Scope statements should be exact: Plugsky provides the model API, deployment variants, scoped authentication and audit events. It does not provide identity proofing, classification authority, records policy or accreditation. Endpoint coverage is the same everywhere: chat, streaming, JSON mode, function calling and embeddings are live, while audio, images, files and batch are labelled coming soon.

Honest comparison

ConcernPlugsky on-prem or air-gappedVPC deploymentShared public cloud
Data locationAgency network or enclaveAgency cloud tenancyVendor infrastructure
Classification fitControlled through classified, subject to assessmentControlled and lowerUnclassified or low sensitivity
Key custodyAgency secret managementAgency cloud secretsVendor-managed keys
Update pathAgency-controlled import and rolloutProvider-managedVendor-managed
EffortHighest: capacity and accreditationModerateLowest

Frequently asked questions

Can air-gapped deployments receive updates?

Yes, through the agreed release process under the licensing agreement: bundles and platform releases are imported and applied under agency change control rather than pulled from the internet.

Does the API change between cloud and air-gapped?

No. The same OpenAI-compatible API is exposed, so applications and evaluations do not change when the deployment topology changes.

Who holds the API keys?

The agency does, in its own secret management, with documented rotation, dual control and revocation procedures that assessors can inspect.

What is in the accreditation evidence pack?

Topology and data flows, identity and key controls, SIEM evidence sources, retention settings, and change and incident procedures.

Which capabilities are available on-prem?

Chat completions with streaming, JSON mode and function calling, plus embeddings, are live. Audio, images, files, batch, moderation, fine-tuning and assistants are labelled coming soon.

How do we avoid over-buying capacity?

Size on peak concurrency and context length with a headroom margin, and keep a pilot scope small until utilisation data exists.

Is there a lower-effort intermediate step?

Yes. VPC deployment keeps workload data inside an agency tenancy with less operational burden than full on-prem; use it where policy allows.